http://www.mobiface.com en Copyright 2005, Eugen Clim mobiface.com http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=103 Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:23:20 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=103

Come to think of it, phone was the first social “network” and paper address book was the friends list. What phone manufacturers failed to realize in time that everything was about social aspect - that paper address book - and not the hardware itself. If they had the right vision, we’d see Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorola social networks before Facebook.

The only change that happened was the integration of address book into the phone.
But it was same static alphabet-sorted address book. It didn’t care about with whom you communicate the most. Didn’t care who are your friends. Didn’t care what they are doing now... And it still doesn’t. Only recently address books started to integrate with social networks, but it’s far from perfection.

The goal is an address book that places your uncalled friend that has a birthday today on a featured spot. That prioritizes people close to you. That lets you follow their lives. In short, an address book that initiates conversation instead of being a simple alphabetic index. ]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=103 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=102 Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:48:56 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=102 blinking light on BlackBerry phones.



Unfortunately those little details should be a consistent part of the whole experience, not things of their own. Ericsson phones had that blinking light long before BlackBerry ones. The green light at the top was constantly blinking showing that the phone has reception, it was blinking faster to notify of a message or missed call and turned red on low battery. Users loved that feature, it was easy to spot the phone in the dark and tell at a glance if you missed a message or need to charge the battery. The question is - where are Ericsson phones now? ]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=102 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=101 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:49:39 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=101

Personification is giving human traits to non-living objects. Samsung Nori is a good example of phone "personification".

(via Samsung Hub) ]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=101 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=100 Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:50:05 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=100
What’s an ideal interface? An easy to use one, requiring minimal effort to learn to use and ensuring effective operation? Right, but all these and other definitions sidestep the real answer: ideal interface is no interface.

One of the approaches when designing a product is to think how the product would work as if it was magic. In other words how it would work if totally stripped from unnecessary interaction required by technology limitations or old paradigms. And then try to design your product as close to the magic solution as possible.

I’d also suggest another approach: start designing the interaction by thinking how the product would work with “no interface”, so the communication between the user and the system or object doesn’t require conscious reasoning.



Think of the “interface” of a knife - the communication of the object’s “features” by its shape is almost instant. As an example imagine you are designing a phone. Reduce everything to a core feature. Remove the standard interface. Now ask yourself how would a device made to communicate just with one person look like?

]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=100 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=99 Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:53:33 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=99 Instead of being just a passive search function, it starts offering possible actions. If to apply this idea further to how the Spotlight works it may become a truly powerful interface to all native and 3rd party app functionality.

]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=99 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=98 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:55:42 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=98
]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=98 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=97 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:06:17 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=97 Puma phone is one the best current examples: it’s not just a Sagem device with changed icons and backgrounds. It has an original UI look and feel, a lot of sport-related apps and functionality. Not to forget the solar panel on the back used to recharge the battery.



Good times are coming for UI designers as a lot of non-mobile companies will try to enter the mobile area with a customized around their brands experience.

Fashion brands are doing that for some time time, but it’s not really interesting as it’s usually only about the logo on the device front and nothing more. The interesting trend is a UI and hardware design mix to enhance the whole experience. Like some watchmakers are trying to do in their phones, combining watch-themed interfaces and apps with integrated watch technology like moving rotors inside the device that use kinetic energy to recharge the battery.

Who’s next? Leatherman phone with digital compass and other useful apps, powerful LED flashlight and bottle opener? Duracell phone with energy saving apps that can work from any battery type from AAA to D? ]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=97 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=96 Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:07:14 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=96

Some random thoughts on Windows Phone 7. First, its tiled look resembles a bit the homescreen boxes of Symbian ^3 and magazine-like iRiver interfaces, but the real inspiration seems to come from wayfinding signs with their big clean typography.



The interface seems to be created under a graphic designer lead and not an interaction designer, as the experience revolves around graphics and not vice versa. That causes some inconsistency: some parts feature “content-as-navigation” concept like actual picture as a link to picture viewer and some feature just plain icons like Internet Explorer icon as a link to the browser. There are some visual contrast between tiles and icons, doesn’t look too consistent (same thing can be said about Symbian ^3 homescreen). With the addition of 3rd party apps there will be lots of icons, interesting how tiles vs icons will look then.

I think the goal was to out-style Apple, but it went too far. It’s like they wanted to create a new improved Twitter, but got carried away along the way and ended up with smth like 2advanced flash site. ]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=96 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=95 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:39:33 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=95 ]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=95 http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=94 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:55:27 GMT http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=94

Yesterday’s iPad presentation gave us another lesson on how to solve interaction “puzzles”.

Everyone was wondering how Apple would position the home button on a device that doesn’t have the “right” orientation. Would it be on the back? Would there be 2 buttons for symmetry?

Keyboard was the main puzzle as in landscape mode you can’t reach the center of the screen with your thumbs while holding the device. Would you split the keyboard in two and group the keys around corners like Microsoft Origami? Or maybe some other way?

Also how do you position the device on the table or on the laps? Some kind of universal kickstand?

No. With an unbeatable elegancy Apple solved all those issues by taking “there’s nothing to solve” approach.

It’s the same home button as in the iPhone. You’ll be able to find it in any orientation. Don’t over-complicate things. It’s the same keyboard. Want to type in landscape mode? Rest the device against something and type. Don’t over-complicate things. Want to place it on table in standing position? Buy an accessory. We are not going to disfigure our sleek aluminum back with some kickstand.

Do not over-complicate things. ]]> http://www.mobiface.com/view.php?id=94